![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Strengths
A
successful network process has been initiated, allowing a range of botanists
across the region regular interaction with other regional botanists.
It
has provided a forum for communication among a whole range of regional and
international botanists and those with an interest in the subject. It has
also created a functional model for regional scientific collaboration.
The project has focussed
attention on plant conservation as part of the Convention of Biological Diversity.
The project has enabled
herbaria to collect new data through field trips.
As
repositories of scientific information on plants, herbaria across the region
have benefited from funding to assist in making information more useable through
a process of computerisation.
Most of the activities
initiated are sustainable.
The project has increased
human capacity within a range of herbaria and in various skills.
Many SABONET trainees
have been or are likely to be absorbed into permanent positions.
Activities have sensitised
herbaria and regional botanists to the use of herbarium data in applied conservation.
The NBI’s capacity
to host the project has made it a successful one.
Weaknesses
Attention afforded to the the way in which obtained
information could be disseminated to users, and
the effective use of the capacity created, have
been insufficient—the
result of which is widely differing implementation capacities.
Project management
skills need strengthening.
There is a lack of
permanent positions for some trained staff; consequently, high staff turnover
is a problem, especially with regard to training.
Uncertainty exists
over the sustainability (and thus importance) of computerisation in some smaller
herbaria, and as a result, the quality of computerised data concerning determination,
nomenclature, and georeferencing varies greatly.
Requirements and
priorities differ.
Roles and mandates
differ.
back to Mid-Term Review main page

